Automations

The strongest side of this system is the ability to almost completely automate the processing of large volumes of psychological material and move this work into the background. I see no point in spending a significant amount of time manually digging through piles of internal garbage. It is far more rational to “press a button” and hand this task over to subconscious mechanisms, while you go on living your life. Sometimes you can hear the objection that only bringing material into conscious awareness guarantees its processing and disappearance. This is nothing more than a point of view and a habitual working model, not a universal law. If someone is interested in spending years dissecting their internal constructions one by one, examining them carefully and deriving satisfaction from the process of awareness — that is their choice. This approach does not suit me. My task is to remove the garbage as quickly as possible, stop reproducing it, and move on.

It is important to understand that the goal of working with the system is not just to get rid of a certain amount of accumulated material, but to change the very mechanism of its constant generation. Most of this “garbage” exists exclusively in subjective psychological reality and has no direct relation to objective reality. We are used to handling our own mental apparatus in such a way that we continuously reproduce the same tensions, reactions, and interpretations, feeding internal noise. By removing this material, we, first, free up attention, and second, begin to better understand which internal actions lead to the accumulation of problems and which do not. Those who are interested can even track these changes using objective methods, for example by comparing EEG data before starting the practice and after several months. This is not a required part of the work, but as an illustration of change it can be interesting.

For me personally, the key value of the system lies precisely in the possibility of automation. Not in the need for constant analysis, but in the fact that you can set an algorithm and let the process run. If someone had told me a few years before creating this system that such an approach was possible and would work, I would have been skeptical. However, practice has shown that this is not only possible, but effective — even if not always in a linear way. Minor limitations of the method do not outweigh its main advantage — the ability to process large volumes of material without constant conscious involvement. It is the automatic protocols that have turned out to be the closest analogue to a so-called “magic pill,” if by that we mean not an instant effect, but stable changes within a reasonable period of time.

In essence, each automation, or as we call it, a “protocol,” is a detailed instruction for subconscious processes. It describes what type of material is to be processed, how the processing should occur, and within what time frame. After reading the instruction once, the user only needs to launch it using the specified trigger phrase and continue with their usual activities.

You become familiar with the first such protocol quite early — this is “Cyber-Zhivo,” which performs a basic clearing of the past according to a predefined algorithm. After completing the initial phase of work — polarities and emotional clusters — you can move on to other entry-level protocols that work with beliefs, fears, and a range of states. As practice progresses, their effectiveness becomes sufficiently obvious to continue further work. This can be done in two ways: either by writing your own protocols, which requires some understanding of the principles but is generally accessible, or by using ready-made, more specialized solutions. Experience shows that sooner or later most people begin to write their own protocols anyway, since it is impossible to anticipate all possible individual states in advance.

Most protocols, in the course of their work, also touch on past experience, so even without targeted work on the past its subjective load decreases over time. If necessary, you can create protocols for specific states, beliefs, situations, or even for interaction with particular people — in the sense in which they are represented in your perception.

Over time, as experience accumulates, it becomes possible to create protocols for almost any task. Theoretically, it is even possible to reproduce the effects of various “spiritual” or esoteric practices in the form of functional emulations triggered by a single phrase. However, I do not recommend engaging in this before stabilizing your overall state and completing basic clearing. It should also be taken into account that a side effect of deep processing is that many previous beliefs lose their persuasiveness. Therefore, do not be surprised if what once seemed significant or inspiring begins to be perceived with irony. At some point, interest in such experiments may disappear, or it may reappear — but already as a conscious play with models rather than belief in them.

Using protocols is extremely simple. The protocol is read once — aloud or silently, it does not matter. After that, it is launched by repeating the trigger phrase until yawning or another characteristic response occurs. The launch is done once. Restarting the same protocol or repeating it multiple times makes no sense — it only creates unnecessary load and may lead to fatigue or unpleasant sensations. The logic of operation is simple: read it, launch it, and go on with your life. Everything else happens in the background without your constant involvement.